The Royce Roundtable: Small-Caps Looking Strong in 2026
article 01-06-2026

The Royce Roundtable: Small-Caps Looking Strong in 2026

Portfolio Managers Lauren Romeo and Jim Harvey join CEO and Co-CIO Chris Clark and Co-CIO Francis Gannon to discuss why they’re constructive on small-cap’s prospects in 2026 and how they’re positioning their portfolios.

TELL US
WHAT YOU
THINK

Were you surprised that small cap was able to hold and maintain its market leadership from the early April low?

Francis Gannon: Not really, no. I think we should look at history, which tells us that coming out of lows, small- and micro-cap stocks typically bounce back the best, which is what we saw from the low on April 8th through the end of 2025. I'm kind of just going to rely on history to answer that one.

Jim Harvey: It was a good run for our Small-Cap Opportunistic Value Strategy. It was sort of a low quality driven rally, which is also typical historically. A lot of the micro-caps and lower quality stocks that we own all performed very well coming out of that April bottom.

FG: Which is typical, right? Given the long-term history of our Strategies, as well as what we know about the historical performance patterns of small- and micro-cap asset classes, this is kind of how they act coming out of bottoms.

Lauren Romeo: I think the key driver of the rally was a reversal of the fears that drove small-caps into bear market territory in the first place. April 8th was the point of peak pessimism. The market was assuming very high odds of a U.S. recession due to the new tariff regime introduced on “Liberation Day.” As the subsequent tariff news flow turned more positive (for example, 90-day implementation pauses, preliminary trade deals with key trade partners on more favorable terms) and expectations about the economy recalibrated back toward growth, investor enthusiasm for small-caps was understandable as the asset class is often viewed as a proxy for the health of the economy given they generate roughly 80% of their revenue from the U.S. The absolute and relative valuations of small-caps, and their earnings growth outlook, also remain more attractive compared to mid- and large-caps.

Chris Clark: I agree. I think the inflection of earnings growth that many companies experienced in the third quarter. We had a significant rally off that April 8th low, but robust earnings helped to sustain the momentum as we moved into the third-quarter reporting season. The strength of earnings growth for certain small- and micro-cap companies helped the overall asset class to deliver returns in excess of what large-caps did.

Micro-Cap’s Very Impressive Return Off the April Market Low
Russell Index Returns, 4/8/25-12/31/25

Small-Caps Rising

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

How much of an impact do you think the two interest rate cuts were on small-cap returns?

CC: I think they were very impactful. We’ve so far sort of deconstructed the components of the rally, though another key component was the strength small-caps often exhibit in the early stage of a falling rate cycle. Jim mentioned how it was a low-quality rally, which means that those more highly levered, higher capital intensive businesses tended to do better because of the relief they’re getting in their capital structure from lower rates.

FG: That’s right. However, I don’t think rates will play as large a role in 2026. I think earnings strength and quality will drive performance, especially within small-cap, as part of a broadening market.

JH: To Frank’s point, our team began talking about this a year ago. We thought that 2025 was going to be the year where earnings would really begin to shine for small-caps, but it now looks like 2026 could really be the year for that. In terms of interest rates, they’re always going to be a backdrop of the market, and at times I think people get overly fixated on them. It is good news, though, that rates are headed in the right direction—but it’s really more about the level. Many smaller companies were unable to refinance at a decent rate over the last few years because there’s been so much uncertainty in the market and economy. But I think we’re moving away from the uncertainty narrative. I don’t think we need rates to continue to decline into 2026, though I think they probably will. I agree with Frank that earnings growth is going to be a much more significant driver of small-cap performance in 2026.

Do you think that rates need to keep falling for small-caps to outpace large-caps in 2026?

LR: I don’t think so. Small-caps’ current absolute valuations remain reasonable, and the case for their reversion to the mean of relative valuation versus large-caps remains compelling. Small-caps also only recently emerged from an earnings recession that lasted more than two years. The return to small-cap earnings growth, and, importantly, at a projected pace that is much faster than that of large-caps, could prove to be the key catalyst for sustained outperformance in 2026.

Do you think micro caps, which have been the best performing asset class since the April lows, will continue to do well in 2026?

JH: Micro-cap returns are often a barometer of risk. So to the extent that the market continues to be comfortable with liquidity and a willingness to take risk, micro-caps should do well. There are some higher-quality micro caps, and if the market continues to broaden out, more micro caps could participate.

LR: Given micro-caps’ rapid appreciation and valuation multiple expansion in 2025, my guess is that the pattern of past small-cap rallies from troughs will repeat itself, which would mean that the leadership baton within small-caps passes from more speculative stocks to more established, quality small-cap companies with proven, durable business models. As Jim said, there are quality and emerging quality micro-caps that can benefit from that leadership shift.

Do you all see earnings as the key to small-cap capturing sustained market leadership?

FG: Definitely. I think we’ll also begin to see a rotation in the market to more broad-based performance. Jim and Lauren can probably address this better, but I think leadership is going to go shift from the companies that are supplying AI, to the beneficiaries of AI, and that's going to include a lot of businesses beyond the mega-cap names. Companies are just beginning to scratch the surface in terms of productivity enhancements and margin expansion, so that’s another dimension to the earnings story.

JH: I think that's a really good point. The market has favored the obvious AI beneficiaries right out of the gate, but that’s going to change. In fact, we own companies that have already benefited from this early phase. These are companies that supply components or help build the power plants, help build out the grid, build the infrastructure, and all the other technologies and industrial requirements to make AI happen. This path is going to continue, to Frank’s point. And the good thing about that, I think, is that certain companies that appear poised to benefit have been beaten down because of this idea that AI is going to replace everything. So you have consulting companies and software businesses that have just been taken down. But we're talking to many of them and doing a lot of research and analysis. We think a new narrative will emerge that shows that these companies are actually beneficiaries of AI and are likely to see improved profitability. We’ve seen a similar dynamic before within small-cap, where there are pockets of the market that are really beaten down before other investors realize that these companies are really well positioned to benefit from a new technology and these stocks tend to rebound nicely.

Small-Cap’s Estimated Earnings Growth is Expected to Be Higher Than Large-Cap’s in 2026
One-Year EPS Growth

Small-Caps Rising

Past performance is not guarantee of future results. Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated as a company’s profit divided by the outstanding shares of its common stock. The EPS Growth Estimates are the pre-calculated mean two-year EPS growth rate estimates by brokerage analysts. Estimates are the average of those provided by analysts working for brokerage firms who provide research coverage on each individual security as reported by FactSet. All non-equity securities, investment companies, and companies without brokerage analyst coverage are excluded. Source: FactSet.

How large a role is AI playing in the Strategies you manage?

LR: To quote Mark Twain and echo what Frank and Jim have said, “During the gold rush, it’s a good time to be in the pick and shovel business.” OpenAI and its competitors generate headlines almost daily about the billions of dollars they or their ecosystem partners have raised to fund continued investment in AI models, computing power, data center capacity, etc.

Across our Strategies we own companies that have already reaped the benefits of this spending since they provide differentiated products or services that are key enablers of AI’s evolution and the buildout of AI-related infrastructure. A few examples include a duopoly provider of advanced probe cards that are essential for testing complex high bandwidth memory chips and GPUs, a critical infrastructure products producer that is a dominant national provider of highly engineered utility structures that are required for utilities to harden their grids and expand higher voltage transmission in the face of rising load growth (in part from AI data centers), a specialty infrastructure services provider that is the scale player in site preparation for mission critical construction projects such as data centers and semiconductor fabs, and a premier engineering and consulting firm that brings domain expertise to clients incorporating machine learning and AI into their systems and products, and helps address the challenges and disputes that may arise.

Do you think there’s an underexplored element in the AI story of certain companies that are being left for dead that actually will benefit from AI?

JH: We’ve seen that dynamic in IT services companies—which have historically done very well during periods of technological disruption. This is probably the third or fourth phase of technological disruption that we’ve seen since I've been in the business. In each case, these IT services companies have come back better and stronger. The more recent cases are particularly fascinating because the market is saying that there's just no need for enterprises to need help figuring out AI, which just sounds crazy to me. Now, the business models might change a little bit for these companies; they might need fewer humans, which is understandable, but these companies have been investing in AI and these types of capabilities for a decade, so we think they are perfectly positioned to go out and help enterprises. But if you look at the stock prices, market does not agree with us.

With so much attention being devoted to AI, what less hyped-up areas of the market do you find promising?

LR: Our stock selection in the Premier Quality Strategies is bottom-up. We focus on durable, high ROIC business models that are selling for what we think are reasonable valuations. Over the last few months, we’ve found reasonably valued companies with these characteristics in several sectors, such as Consumer Staples, and in diverse industries such as commercial and professional services, transportation, and capital markets.

JH: We’ve recently added a few Consumer Discretionary names that appear to have been overly punished on tariff concerns. One issue that really has not received a lot of press is that the fate of tariffs is in the hands of the Supreme Court, and we’re supposed to hear about their decision shortly. This could be a market moving decision if the Court rules that that tariffs in their current form are illegal and potentially orders refunds, which could be a windfall for many companies and may help shift the attitude of consumers, which continues to be negative even as spending has been pretty robust. The potentially positive effects of the “Big, Beautiful Bill” are also not really being talked about much, although most of our companies have started talking about it over the last two most recent quarters. I think the impacts of tax relief and spending incentives are really going to hit throughout 2026, and small-caps could be significant beneficiaries.

We’ve also been active in Energy and areas in Health Care beyond biopharma, which really dominated small-cap performance in 2025. Historically, the Small-Cap Opportunistic Value Strategy has been heavily weighted in Industrials and Information Technology, and those areas where we’ve seen companies benefiting from AI-related spending. And to the extent that there’s going to be a broadening out of returns, we think we’re pretty well positioned to capture that.

With private equity, alts, and dual shares increasingly touted as investment options for ordinary retail investors, what do you think gives small-cap an advantage over these options?

LR: Speaking for the Small-Cap Premier Quality Strategy that I manage with Steven McBoyle, I’d say that over the long term, quality small-caps—for example, those with high returns on invested capital (ROIC), little debt, and proven management—have historically offered investors attractive compound annualized returns with less risk than the benchmark, but also greater liquidity, less leverage, and lower fees than private equity investments.

Small-caps as a whole have also been out of favor relative to large-caps for over a decade, which has created significant reversion to the mean potential for the asset class on both valuation and performance. Conversely, in private capital, particularly private equity, returns may have peaked given the flood of fundraising and new competition over the past decade, the normalization of interest rates, and delayed exits for portfolio holdings. As Frank has discussed, small-caps are benefiting from private equity’s “exit problem,” with several holdings in our Small-Cap Premier Quality Strategy acquiring private equity-backed companies in 2025 at multiples below their own and much lower than their industry averages.

Finally, while the latest data shows global private equity “dry powder” down over 5% from its peak, there is still over $2.1 trillion of uncommitted capital. Some portion of that will likely be put to use, with publicly traded companies, including small-caps, continuing to be a source for private equity acquisitions. We believe that companies in the quality universe remain attractive targets because they possess the financial and business model traits consistent with those sought by private (and strategic) investors. The high percentage of unprofitable small-cap companies within the Russell 2000 often gets the headlines. However, it obscures the large pool of high quality small-caps that consistently generate above-average returns on invested capital, solid free cash flow, along with strong balance sheets. Like their large cap siblings, these small-cap standouts have unique and sustainable competitive advantages that enable them to compound shareholder value at attractive rates of return via investment back into the business or inorganic opportunities.

The U.S. economy continues to show mixed signals. What are your thoughts on the economy, and how is this uncertainty affecting portfolio positioning?

JH: I’m pretty bullish on the economy. We have the World Cup coming to North America, with 11 American host cities in each region of the country. That’s creating and will continue to create a lot of economic activity all over the country, including large numbers of tourists who’ll be visiting to see the games. We also have the 250th anniversary of American independence in July, which is another feel good moment for the U.S. I think these events should help shore up consumer confidence, which is another reason why we’ve been adding names in the Consumer Discretionary sector.

CC: Picking up on Jim’s points, we could have a Goldilocks economy and market in 2026. The combination of government spending, falling inflation, lower rates, a housing recovery, and earnings growth can really keep share prices climbing and the economy growing. There are some obvious geopolitical situations that can stress growth, especially in Venezuela and Ukraine, but there is a lot that can go right over the next 12 months.

LR: One nice thing about the business buyer’s approach we use in our Strategy is that it requires us to be business analysts, not macroeconomists. While we understand how various economic factors can impact each our holdings, we primarily evaluate companies on their long-term, through-cycle (that is, peak and trough) cash flow power. There is often an “all-weather” aspect to quality companies. Their strong balance sheets and relatively predictable free cash flow generation allows them not just to weather tough economic periods, but to go on the offensive and take market share from or acquire weaker competitors. In more historically typical periods of economic growth, quality companies tend to outgrow their markets as they are often providing unique and differentiated services or products that are critical to their customers’ success or enable secular demand tailwinds.

FG: I think people are not yet focusing on one important aspect of the federal budget bill, which now allows for 100% depreciation and could therefore jump start a robust CapEx cycle in 2026. It’s going to be interesting to see what companies were doing when fourth-quarter earnings are reported. We could also see corporate earnings tax rates come down pretty dramatically, which I think is going to be very beneficial to small-caps. Throw deregulation on top of that, along with one or two more Fed cuts, possible tariff relief, reshoring, and the earnings story and I think you’ve got a really healthy economy that should also improve the already solid state of small cap performance.

What is the outlook for your Strategies in 2026?

JH: We regularly review our value themes in our portfolio, which helps us frame why we continue to hold our positions. We’ve been finding that there are just a lot of companies that do not seem valued properly based on their earnings potential, and we think that much of that potential is going to be recognized by the wider market in short order. One of the biggest things we’ve seen is that, even with the Russell 2000 flirting with new highs, there are still segments of the market that have not been carried along with it, which is something that we usually see during rallies. There are almost always interesting opportunities at what we think are bargain basement prices. I talked about Health Care earlier, and that sector offers a good example of how we see the year ahead. Within small-cap, there are a lot of companies outside the biopharma complex that look very interesting to us. We think there’s likely to be a rotation in the sector, and our job is to try to get ahead of it so our investors can potentially reap the rewards down the road.

The biggest of our four investment themes right now is undervalued growth, where we see a lot of companies that screen well based on low price to sales and price to book. We’ve been talking to management teams and analysts who share our view that these businesses look ready to grow, though the market doesn’t yet agree, which gives us plenty of opportunities to buy what we think are terrific growth companies at really low prices. Overall, our outlook for the Strategy is very constructive.

LR: Given the sharp multiple expansion among lower quality small-cap companies, such as those with low ROIC, no profits, and/or more speculative profiles, it would not be surprising to see small-cap leadership again follow its historical pattern and transition to higher quality companies. We believe many of our portfolio companies created measurable economic value in 2025 that was not fully reflected in their stock prices. This valuation disconnect, along with accelerating growth, underpinned by durable business models with identifiable, high return reinvestment opportunities, should drive further compounding of value, creating an attractive setup for quality small-caps in 2026.

FG: I’m very constructive because we appear to be seeing an almost perfect amalgamation, if you will, of attractively cheap valuations and high company quality. When you put that together, you wind up with exposure to several wonderful attributes—which Lauren and Jime have each talked about. I would add that qualities such as entrepreneurial growth, innovation, automation, and long-term compounding are yet to be recognized by the overall market in many instances. That’s created a very appealing opportunity set in all of our domestic Strategies, which leads me to believe 2026 could be quite an exciting time for the asset class, and active small-cap management in particular.

Important Disclosure Information

Average Annual Total Returns as of 12/31/2025 (%)

  QTD1 1YR 3YR 5YR 10YR SINCE
INCEPT.
DATE ANNUAL
OPERATING EXPENSES
NET               GROSS
Small-Cap 1.95 8.95 13.90 8.38 11.11 N/A N/A  0.93  0.93
Small-Cap Opportunity 1.75 11.86 13.84 9.87 12.64 11.84 11/19/96  1.22  1.22
Premier 1.35 5.63 10.05 5.56 10.34 10.83 12/31/91  1.19  1.19
Russell 2000
2.19 12.81 13.73 6.09 9.62 N/A N/A  N/A  N/A
Russell 2000 Value
3.26 12.59 11.73 8.88 9.27 N/A N/A  N/A  N/A
1 Not annualized.

All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis, reflects the reinvestment of distributions, and does not reflect the deduction of taxes a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. Current month-end performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted and may be obtained at www.royceinvest.com. Operating expenses reflect each Fund's total annual operating expenses for the Investment Class as of each Fund's most current prospectus and include management fees, other expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses. Acquired fund fees and expenses reflect the estimated amount of the fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Funds through its investments in mutual funds and other investment companies.

As with any mutual fund that invests in common stocks, the Funds are subject to market risk—the possibility that common stock prices will decline over short or extended periods of time. As a result, the value of your investment in a Funds will fluctuate, sometimes sharply and unpredictably, and you could lose money over short or long periods of time. Each Fund’s investments in securities of micro-cap, small-cap, and/or mid-cap companies may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap companies. (see "Primary Risks for Fund Investors" in the respective prospectus.) Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money. Fund investments in foreign securities may involve political, economic, currency, and other risks not encountered in U.S. investments. Funds that invest a significant portion of their assets in a limited number of stocks may involve considerably more risk than more broadly diversified portfolio. A broadly diversified portfolio, however, does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. (See "Primary Risks for Fund Investors" in the respective prospectus.) Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.

Mr. Clark’s, Mr. Gannon’s, Mr. Harvey, and Ms. Romeo’s thoughts and opinions concerning the stock market are solely their own and, of course, there can be no assurance with regard to future market movements. No assurance can be given that the past performance trends outlined above will continue in the future.

The performance data and trends outlined in this presentation are presented for illustrative purposes only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Historical market trends are not necessarily indicative of future market movements.

Return on Invested Capital is calculated by dividing a company’s past 12 months of operating income (earnings before interest and taxes) by its average invested capital (total equity, less cash and cash equivalents, plus total debt, minority interest, and preferred stock).

Frank Russell Company (“Russell”) is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Frank Russell Company. Neither Russell nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the Russell Indexes and/or Russell ratings, or underlying data and no party may rely on any Russell Indexes and/or Russell ratings and/or underlying data contained in this communication. No further distribution of Russell Data is permitted without Russell’s express written consent. Russell does not promote, sponsor, or endorse the content of this communication. The Russell 2000 is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of domestic small-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 index. The Russell Microcap Index includes 1,000 of the smallest securities in the small-cap Russell 2000 Index, along with the next smallest eligible securities as determined by Russell. The Russell 1000 Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of domestic large-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 2000 Value and Growth indexes consist of the respective value and growth stocks within the Russell 2000 as determined by Russell Investments. The performance of an index does not represent exactly any particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index.

This material is not authorized for distribution unless preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money. As with any mutual fund that invests in common stocks, the Funds are subject to market risk—the possibility that common stock prices will decline over short or extended periods of time. As a result, the value of your investment in a Fund will fluctuate, sometimes sharply and unpredictably, and you could lose money over short or long periods of time. Fund investments in securities of micro-cap, small-cap, and/or mid-cap companies may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap companies. (see "Primary Risks for Fund Investors" in the respective Prospectus.) Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money. Fund investments in foreign securities may involve political, economic, currency, and other risks not encountered in U.S. investments. Funds that invest a significant portion of their assets in a limited number of stocks may involve considerably more risk than more broadly diversified portfolio. A broadly diversified portfolio, however, does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. (See "Primary Risks for Fund Investors" in the respective prospectus.) Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.

Share:

Subscribe:

Sign Up

Follow: